Welcome to your ultimate noise and vibration analysis resource


xlnoise.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

soundproofing acceptable machinery noise levels
noise Spectrum Analysis Excell
noise problem hardwood floors in condos condo
vibration  

OSHA Guide to Noise and Hearing Safety, Health And Conservation

One of the occupational hazards of living inoperational parts mandated: (1) Noise
the modern industrial age is noise exposure,monitoring (2) Audiometric Testing (3)
both in and away from the workplace. AcousticEmployee Training (4) Hearing Protectors and
noise can be defined as unwanted sound and(5)  Record  Keeping.
sounds louder than 80 decibels (dB) are
considered potentially dangerous. AccordingNoise  monitoring
to the National Institute on Deafness and
Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), moreSound levels in the workplace must be
than 30 million Americans are regularlymeasured to ascertain which employees to
exposed to hazardous sound levels. Accordinginclude in the program, the need for hearing
to the EPA the number of people exposed toprotection  equipment  and  its  suitability.
work induced noise damage is around 9
million.Audiometric  Testing
Noise is considered a necessary evil and theAll employees in the program must be
insidious effects of exposure abovesubjected to a base line audiometric test to
acceptable levels are generally not realized,determine pre-existing hearing loss, if any.
mostly because there are no visible effects.Annual tests are to be carried out thereafter
The primary effect of excessive noise isto asses the effectiveness of the program and
hearing loss, either temporary or permanent,for appropriate remedial action as necessary.
depending on the level and duration ofThe standard specifically requires that the
exposure. What is even less well known areaudiometric tests be carried out by duly
the secondary effects ranging from sleepqualified personnel under the supervision of
disturbances: stress and fatigue,an audiologist, otolaryngologist or
irritability, annoyance and lack ofphysician.
concentration. Noise induced lack of
attention and the consequent loss inEmployee  Training
efficiency are matters of prime concern in
the workplace. Not only is productivityAll employees in the program must receive
impaired, but chances of accidents, impingingannual training on the effects of noise on
on worker and workplace safety, are alsohearing, hearing protection devices and the
increased.purpose  of  audiometric  testing.
The federal Occupational Safety and HealthHearing  Protectors
Administration (OSHA) has developed
regulations for acceptable threshold limitsHearing protection devices must be made
of noise in the workplace and mitigation ofaccessible  to  all employees in the program.
excessive noise. The 29 CFR standards 1910.95
Occupational noise exposure, lays downRecord  Keeping
permissible exposure limits for different
durations of exposure. The recommend exposureRecords of employee exposure (sound
level, as per the standard, is 85 dB A on anmeasurement), acoustic or exhaustive
8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) basis. Ifaudiometer calibration, and audiometric test
this limit is exceeded, feasiblerecords must be updated. These records are to
administrative or engineering controls are tobe  maintained  for specific periods of time.
be utilized. If such controls fail to reduce
sound levels within the permissible exposureExperience has shown that effective hearing
limits, personal protective equipment (PPE)loss protection programs are universally
is to be provided. Further, irrespective ofbeneficial and that both employer and
the reduction of noise exposure to 85 dB A oremployees stand to gain from the programs.
below with the use of PPE, the employer is toThe employees are protected from hearing
implement  a hearing loss protection program.loss, fatigue and general debility. The
employer benefits from improvement in
The 1910.95 standard refers to the mandatedemployee morale and productivity and will
hearing protection program as the "Hearingalso enjoy reduced medical and worker
conservation program". This program has fivecompensation costs.



1 A B C D E 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132