Current Status of Video Objective Measurements

This paper explores the challenges associated withalgorithms. Full reference algorithms perform a detailed
assessing video quality. Assessing video qualitycomparison of the input and output video sequence.
ultimately depends on the customer's reaction on theirThis is a computationally intensive process, which
new TV. Many factors affect the video before it getsinvolves per-pixel processing, and temporal, spatial
to the TV: compression, image processing, scaling,alignment of the input and output streams. Full
decoding, transmission, etc. To isolate their videoreference algorithms can achieve good levels of
algorithm, companies perform verification using:correlation with subjective test data. Having the
subjective and objective video assessment techniques.reference video sequence available is only possible for
While it would be far cheaper, to perform onlycertain applications: for example in lab testing,
objective test, nothing beats the human eye. Thus,pre-deployment test or troubleshooting.
Objective video quality measurements and SubjectiveOne of the earliest full reference algorithms is PSNR
video quality assessment are complementary rather(Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), which is literally a
than interchangeable. Subjective assessment ismeasurement of the mean error between input and
appropriate for research related purposes; objectiveoutput as a ratio of the peak signal level, expressed in
measurements are required for equipmentdB. A typical "good" PSNR is around 30dB and it is
specifications and day-to-day system performancegenerally accepted that PSNR values of less than
measurement and monitoring.18dB are unacceptable. PSNR is the most widely used
Problem Statementtechnique for image and video quality measurement.
When dealing with equipment to process TV & videoA wide range of full reference algorithms have been
transmissions, every design depends on accurate,developed, including MPQM (Moving Pictures Quality
repeatable measurements. A complex relationshipMetric - 1996) full reference algorithm from EPFL in
between objective parameter measurements andSwitzerland, the US Government NTIA ITS lab's VQM
subjective video quality exists. The goal is to achieve(Video Quality Metric - 1999), and CVQE (Continuous
an objective metric; that is an automatedVideo Quality Evaluation - 2004) which is more suited
measurement. All of the equipment must be testedfor low bit rate video. ITU-T J.144 does not actually
from video processors, compression units, transmissionspecify a single algorithm but "provides guidelines on
gear, set-top boxes, and displays. The evaluation ofthe selection of appropriate" techniques. J.144 does
the video quality and ultimately, the customer's reactioncontain descriptions and test results for four full
to the picture shown on their new HDTV drives thereference algorithms. The VQM algorithm from the US
business.Government's NTIA ITS lab achieved slightly better
Previous Optionsperformance than the other algorithms listed.
For years, traditional techniques that looked at color,Video Clarity Solution
brightness, contrast, etc. were effective. However, theThe ClearView Video Analysis system simplifies the
advent of compressed digital video transmission haswork flow, by combining the video server and capture
complicated the process of evaluating videodevice into one unit. By doing this, the original source
sequences, with respect to perceived picture quality.and processed video sequences can be displayed -
During compression, a certain amount of the originalside-by-side, mirrored, or seamless split - on the same
content is knowingly discarded. Visible impairmentsdisplay. Further the operator can play any video
such as "blockiness" and Gaussian noise aresequence in any order, at any speed, for any duration
by-products. Traditional measurement techniques thatwith zoom, pan, jog, and shuttle capabilities.
look at color, brightness, contrast, etc. are no longerClearView applies various objective metrics to the
effective.video sequences, generates graphs, and calculates an
Objective Measurement Statusobjective score. While development of more
After analyzing the subjective results, considerableadvanced algorithms is ongoing, we have built a hybrid
work has been done to come up with a quantifiable,system, which offers subjective viewing modes; while
repeatable measurement which is not dependent oncalculating objective measurements. ClearView can
the video sequence. To date, objective measurementseasily be programmed to display video sequences for
have not proven to estimate the user's opinion. Tothe expert viewers; while recording the objective
introduce and qualify new algorithms, Video Qualitymetric scores along with the MOS. While the MOS
Experts Group (VQEG) was formed in 1997, andcannot be repeated, the objective metric can be easily
generally acts in cooperation with ITU. VQEG hasand readily.
conducted two phases of testing; in the first phase tenBenefits
algorithms were tested, and the conclusion reached* Repeatable tests, quantitative results, and a
was that all of them were statistically equivalent. Astreamlined setup.
second phase of testing, conducted several years* Capable of analyzing 2, 1080P video sequences in
later, involved a smaller set of algorithms, morereal-time
controlled video sequences, and a better defined test* ClearView does not alter the original video
environment. The result of the second phasessequences - video sequences are processed
warranted the recent ITU-T Recommendation J.144.completely uncompressed.
Three basic types of objective video assessment* Multiple viewing modes are presented on 1 display -
metrics exist:no need to calibrate 2 separate Television displays to
* Full Reference - A method that conducts acompare video sequences.
comparison of video source to resultant.* Objective Metrics are included as add-ons as the
* Reduced Reference - A method that conducts atechnology advances.
comparison of a reduced video source to a full result.Implementation
* No Reference - A method when there is noClearView takes advantage of the high-reliability of
reference.today's off-the-shelf computer platforms. This ensures
The three methods have different applications, andthat products are made with the latest and greatest
they provide different degrees of measurementhardware available, while at the same time avoiding
accuracy, expressed in terms of correlation withthe high cost of custom designs. ClearView is
subjective assessment results.packages in a 4U, 20" deep Industrial Chassis.
The work to date has centered on full reference